Case Study 01

Authority Gap

Flagship research project investigating how decision-making authority is documented, transferred, interpreted, and exercised across legal, educational, medical, and administrative systems.

Background

The origin

Authority Gap began as an effort to understand how decision-making authority is documented, transferred, interpreted, and exercised across legal, educational, medical, and administrative systems.

The Question

Where does authority actually come from?

When decisions affect a family, the source of authority is not always clear.

  • Statutes
  • Court orders
  • Policies
  • Internal practice
  • Assumptions
Research Method

Process over conclusions

The project prioritizes the record.

  • Records requests
  • Timeline analysis
  • Document comparison
  • Policy review
  • Legal research
  • Communication analysis
Visual Systems

Authority mapping

These tools make invisible structures visible.

Authority Stack Visualizer

Breaks down decision-making powers by category: Residence, Legal Custody, Educational Authority, Medical Authority, Treatment Authority, Communication Authority, Records Access.

Timeline Explorer

Interactive chronology of events with documentation status labels.

Document Relationships

Visual map connecting records, orders, reports, and communications.

Findings

Open findings

Several decision pathways appeared to rely upon assumptions that were not immediately supported by available documentation.

Open Questions

Evolving research archive

This section grows as records are obtained and reviewed.